3 ms·
Evidence for the claim: proves the claim No evidence: obviously the evidence is being suppressed, proves the claim Evidence against the claim: shills obviousl
by brookst 3y ago
Evidence for the claim: proves the claim
No evidence: obviously the evidence is being suppressed, proves the claim
Evidence against the claim: shills obviously trying to control the narrative, proves the claim
- philipov 3y agoI recall an anecdote by a mathematician about his approach to peer-reviewing proofs of theorems. He said he glosses over most of it, but very thoroughly checks anything the author claims to be "obvious" because it's the things that seem obvious that screw people up.