3 ms·
I'd agree that it's somewhat pathetic that Russia needs NK production, but I think we have every reason to believe that NK could actually give very large % of s
by icegreentea2 3y ago
I'd agree that it's somewhat pathetic that Russia needs NK production, but I think we have every reason to believe that NK could actually give very large % of supply and production, and for NK to actually work reasonably well as partner. NK has consistently shown that it understands that it is its long-range nuclear capabilities that best guarantees the continuation of the government. Trading stockpiles of old shells for know-how (or maybe even material) to boost their missile capabilities seems like a reasonable trade. I'm sure the Russians aren't dummies either and will structure agreements to get the best behavior possible out of NK.
NK conventional artillery remains a significant threat to SK population and economic centers, but the 'crown jewel' (bombarding Seoul directly) is only reachable with their largest weapons systems (170mm shells and 240mm rockets) - while what Russia will probably be looking for is 122/152mm shells. Even if NK traded away all of their 122/152mm shells, they would still retain significant deterrence in conventional arms (not even considering potential nuclear arsenal).