2 ms·
The relevant material was almost certainly the slide that the article was mischaracterizing: https://twitter.com/adamkovac/status/1710041764910846061 https://tw
by granzymes 3y ago
The relevant material was almost certainly the slide that the article was mischaracterizing: https://twitter.com/adamkovac/status/1710041764910846061 https://twitter.com/adamkovac/status/1710041764910846061
I wish WIRED had included this context in their retraction statement…