I think you're mixing up "people in Myanmar" and "the Myanmar government". The post is primarily talking about the first one, and Facebook has had an effect on

I think you're mixing up "people in Myanmar" and "the Myanmar government". The post is primarily talking about the first one, and Facebook has had an effect on the first one. > Is it hate speech when we dehumanize nazis, communists, etc? Yes it is > So what erin wants is meta to serve as an anti-myanmar propaganda machine? What the author wants is that facebook doesn't propagate hate speech by putting it up in front just because it makes clicks and money. What the author wants is that when people report hate speech, facebook acts on it. What the author wants is to take on its responsibility as a facilitator to the genocide. > If she wants less suffering why doesn't she advocate that the UK, EU, US, etc stop trying to overthrow the government of myanmar? That's not the topic of the article. Please remain on topic. > It's funny because her article could be classified as hate speech by the people of myanmar. And why is this propaganda on HN? Everything is sourced. Not a single word in the articles calls for the hate of any people, not even Mark Zuckerberg. Please elaborate where you find hateful content.