3 ms·
Hm. Leonardo da Vinci would also be a good contender. "The more I study Isaac Newton, the more fascinating he becomes." Leibniz would also be a good contender
by Beijinger 3y ago
Hm. Leonardo da Vinci would also be a good contender.
"The more I study Isaac Newton, the more fascinating he becomes."
Leibniz would also be a good contender:
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2013/may/10/my-hero-leibniz-lee-smolin https://www.theguardian.com/books/2013/may/10/my-hero-leibni...
https://www.quantamagazine.org/how-to-understand-the-universe-when-youre-stuck-inside-of-it-20190627/ https://www.quantamagazine.org/how-to-understand-the-univers...
"Gottfried Leibniz, active in the 17th and 18th centuries, who along with Isaac Newton invented calculus. Leibniz argued (against Newton) that there’s no fixed backdrop to the universe, no “stuff” of space; space is just a handy way of describing relationships. This relational framework captured Smolin’s imagination, as did Leibniz’s enigmatic text The Monadology, in which Leibniz suggests that the world’s fundamental ingredient is the “monad,” a kind of atom of reality, with each monad representing a unique view of the whole universe. It’s a concept that informs Smolin’s latest work as he attempts to build reality out of viewpoints, each one a partial perspective on a dynamically evolving universe. A universe as seen from the inside."
----
"This interconnection (or accommodation) of all created things to each other,brings it about that each simple substance has relations that express all the others,and consequently, that each simple substance is a perpetual, living mirror of the universe.
Just as the same city viewed from different directions appears entirely different and, as it were, multiplied perspectively, in just the same way it happens that, because of the infinite multitudeof simple substances, there are, as it were, just as many different universes, which are, nevertheless, only perspectives on a single one, . . .
And this is the way of obtaining as much variety as possible, but with the greatest order possible, that is,it is the way of obtaining as much perfection as possible.
—G. W. Leibniz, The Monadology, 56-58, 1714
I once read once a quote about Leibniz, that roughly went like: When Newton was buried, he was buried like a king. When Leibniz was buried, only his servant was present. But the long Leibniz is dead, the longer his shadow becomes.
- zw123456 3y agoAgreed, I was surprised there was no mention of Da Vinci in the article, certainly he has to be in the top 10 in my view.
- The_Blade 3y agoLeibniz was the first thing I thought - IIRC he and Newton basically "invented the calculus" simultaneously and independent of each other. But my stars, Newton's contributions to astronomy, optics, oobleck and fig-based treats put him a cut above :) Da Vinci is somehow underrated here. The Codex Leicester with bike planes &c, probably in Gates' bathroom, and also he was somehow involved in the invention of double-entry accounting. What didn't Leo touch? Benjamin Franklin, boy, that guy. The US, electricity. Bifocals. Franklin stove. Discovered the gulf stream. You can still go to where Ben puked in the Haymarket and occasionally rewrote TJ's little declaration of something or another. BUT - the sleeper here is Thales of Miletus. The first true pre-Socratic philosopher, got into theories about electricity among other things as part of spurning mythology in lieu of science, credited with "know thyself", math that led to the school of Pythagoras (via Anaximander), and I think he invented venture capital by investing in other's olive presses for a tribute.
- wirrbel 3y agoLeibnitz did come up with the differential equations so he took math one level further actually than newton. From mathematical perspective Carl Friedrich Gauss is also someone to consider. Overall i don’t think it makes sense to look for THE most intelligent individual, it certainly depends on the evaluation criteria and is thus subjective.
- notresidenter 3y agoFig newtons are named after a small town in Massachusetts, not the scientist.