2 ms·
You're using a lot of words and terms you think make a point, and they aren't. There is no point in logically engaging with you. As you know, there is an actual
by catlover76 3y ago
You're using a lot of words and terms you think make a point, and they aren't. There is no point in logically engaging with you. As you know, there is an actual genocide against Burmese Muslims by the Burmese government and large segments of its society. It's ongoing. You are pro-genocide.
I don't even think you have anything against Burmese Muslims. I think people like you are moved to anger by others seeking to pursue good. Whoever the victim is, you have a disease of personality and spirit that causes you to attack attempts at sympathy or help towards them. Whatever the broader society or group values, you instinctively tear down.
You think whenever someone wants to shed light on an injustice, you should shit on such an attempt mindlessly. Whenever someone wants to act altruistically, you want to make it seem like they aren't really being altruistic, that they must have some ulterior motive. Because you yourself aren't altruistic, and have no good, and don't care about the suffering of others.
Why are you calling it propaganda? It's a well-documented article, whereas you spew stupidity. Who are you trying to fool by acting like the Burmese government is legitimate? Are a government like the North Korean one and the government that allows you to post the drivel you post freely alike?
The rest of us needn't do anything but down vote you and avoid people like you in real life. It's not even a matter of understanding or misunderstanding something logically; you know that the government of Burma is genocidal and oppressive, you know that the government of Iran is oppressive and rising to ever new heights of brutality, etc, and you know that normal people rightly find that all wrong. But something inside you causes you to want to launch pathetic half-baked defenses of such evil in online posts. Something inside you is rotten and causes you to call a detailed post documenting a pretty evil paper trail from a major corporation--pretty stereotypically what we think good journalism should be, and which we get little of from most major publications--"propaganda".