3 ms·
Maybe they should consider not operating in countries where they unmonitored presence may lead to genocide? There's no obligation to operate everywhere. Instea
by taway1237 3y ago
Maybe they should consider not operating in countries where they unmonitored presence may lead to genocide?
There's no obligation to operate everywhere. Instead, as discussed in previous parts, they invested heavily to get a monopoly in third world countries.
- cultureswitch 3y agoI have a hard time following this reasoning. I would definitely consider Facebook partly responsible for this genocide if they had deliberately made an editorial decision to spread the genocidal rhetoric. But they didn't. The situation was as you put it mostly unmonitored. In other words, the spread of genocidal content was organic. This is the equivalent of blaming the phone company or the ISP for what the users do with the communication channels.