3 ms·
Correct, they wanted to illustrate how an overly broad law, supposedly designed to target pornography, would instead target art.
by berbec 3y ago
Correct, they wanted to illustrate how an overly broad law, supposedly designed to target pornography, would instead target art.
- mcpackieh 3y ago[flagged]
- berbec 3y ago> the typical reality of internet pornography, even though is what they want to be made available to kids You think this article show that TechDirt wants internet pornography to be available to children? I'm confused how you got there.
- nickthegreek 3y agoIf they want to ban explicit pornography, then the law needs to proper define explicit. If it can’t, then the law is broad and will infringe on protected rights. Imagine being pulled over by a cop for going “too fast”, but they get to decide what that means today. It’s ripe for abuse.
- kthejoker2 3y agoPlease write a description of "typical reality of Internet pornography" so we may all decide if we agree. The law in this article gave it a shot and seemingly missed the mark.