3 ms·
At no point have you attacked her work. You haven't even discussed it, you just keep asserting that everything she or her husband does is shit without backing t
by nvm0n2 3y ago
At no point have you attacked her work. You haven't even discussed it, you just keep asserting that everything she or her husband does is shit without backing that up. You literally started by saying Jo Nova is a liar and then immediately claimed that's not an ad hominem! Every reply of yours has been about the names of the people who commissioned the survey. There's been nothing about the actual results of the poll itself, nothing about the reef measurements.
This sub-thread is really the definition of ad hominem. If you wanted to discuss the actual state of the reefs or the science we'd be discussing that. Instead you got triggered by the name Jo Nova which isn't even in the part of the article I quoted. Great job, you continue to debunk your own position and call attention to how apparently impossible it is to refute theirs.
- defrost 3y ago> You literally started by saying Jo Nova is a liar Nope, I said she bends the truth savagely by using all the tricks in the "How to lie with statistics" book - classic misrepresentation of data stuff. I also said that she is widely known for this (also true) and pretty much every post she has ever produced has been debunked (also true). I stand by all of that - I suggest you check that out for yourself. While we're on that, Anthony Watts of Watts Up With That? is another cut from the same cloth. No matter how much you spit and splutter the facts remain, these are people that don't do science in good faith, they shill for the Koch aligned "think tanks" and haven't yet hit a goal.