3 ms·
Sure! None of this means fossil fuel propaganda is somehow defensible. It doesn’t mean marketing fossil fuels to children is defensible either.
by ethanbond 3y ago
Sure! None of this means fossil fuel propaganda is somehow defensible. It doesn’t mean marketing fossil fuels to children is defensible either.
- tomp 3y agoFossil fuels are essential for maintaining our civilisation. Ignoring degrowth / green propaganda is essential for further progress of our civilisation.
- ethanbond 3y agoI see that you’ve contrarianed yourself into a bit of a wormhole here. A few things that come to mind: Degrowth propaganda != green propaganda Propagandizing fossil fuels != combating degrowth propaganda Advertising to children via video games that show “cool cars have flames out the tailpipes” != legitimate socioeconomic argument Maintaining our civilization as-is != ensuring prosperity for current and future generations