3 ms·
What the article didn't mention was that in 2014, it was even more egregious. There was a 24 month, unpaid non-compete -- and it was a condition of employment,
by surfacing_vol 3y ago
What the article didn't mention was that in 2014, it was even more egregious. There was a 24 month, unpaid non-compete -- and it was a condition of employment, rather than attached to some "voluntary" profit-sharing program.