2 ms·
> Google search is a good example of this, ads are literally intertwined into the search results, if you take this a few steps further you have ads that you lit
by lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 3y ago
> Google search is a good example of this, ads are literally intertwined into the search results, if you take this a few steps further you have ads that you literally can't block on the client.
I'm not sure about your "few steps" so this may be moot. Is there no sufficient workaround of this nature?
document.querySelector('.waste-of-money')?.remove();
Google might detect that the element was removed; ad blockers use CSS shenanigans to hide the element. Google might detect such shenanigans; ad blockers are forced to change. And so on. Is there really a way for Google to end this cat/mouse game in their favor?
- matsz 3y ago> Is there really a way for Google to end this cat/mouse game in their favor? Yet another "update" to the web extension manifest.
- lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 3y agoThat will affect a large number of users but if word gets out that this weird fork of Firefox[0] will allow them to view YouTube with no ads, Google is suddenly forced to enable browser attestation such that only versions of Chrome will allow people to use YouTube. That will likely affect those in the US but EU authorities sometimes like to curb these antitrust behaviors. I also get the feeling that such a change will cause them to lose American business to competitors. Amazon seems primed to start eating their lunch with Twitch; they would mostly need to start building and promoting more video on demand features. 0: It sends a "this is totally Chrome" user agent and possibly includes other APIs that YouTube will use.
- dns_snek 3y ago> Amazon seems primed to start eating their lunch with Twitch That seems extremely unlikely, Twitch has already destroyed a lot of the goodwill they had with creators. Policy changes (or attempts) regarding baked-in ads, revenue splits, forced exclusivity, there's probably more.
- lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 3y agoAll good points and I do agree. What I mean is that they have the compute infrastructure to manage it, assuming Youtube makes some colossal mistake with the goodwill they have with viewers.
- HDThoreaun 3y agoI think the issue here is that it might take the adblockers longer to update than it takes google. If google has a team of people doing anti adblock then I suspect it would take them less than a week or maybe even a couple days to update the app to counteract whatever the adblockers come up with. And with each iteration the adblockers have to become more creative.