4 ms·
Yes I’m not fucking stupid. I’m curious where the bias is in the current dietary “plate” recommendations. There’s nothing at all like the fat is bad sugar is g
by demondemidi 3y ago
Yes I’m not fucking stupid.
I’m curious where the bias is in the current dietary “plate” recommendations. There’s nothing at all like the fat is bad sugar is good crime of the 60’s-90’s
So if bias is a real thing show it to me or do you just make vapid comments and run?
- voisin 3y ago> There’s nothing at all like the fat is bad sugar is good crime of the 60’s-90’s It wasn’t “sugar is good”, it was “carbs are good” and this is still a primary component of the recommendations. You’ve given an excellent example of why potential avenues of bias need to be disclosed. Even if it isn’t obvious today that something isn’t scientifically valid, it is harder to identify where errors might be if we don’t know the potential sources of bias. It is worth pausing and asking why these food giant ties were hidden rather if there was no bias arising from the relationships. But to answer your specific question, I would guess there’s bias in today’s “plate” recommendation with respect to animal products, but this is only a guess as I’m no expert - simply a fan of unbiased experts designing these things.