9 ms·
Yeah, exactly this. Paragraphs of condensed scientific text after six rounds of collaborator revisions are typically a mess - ChatGPT is great for suggesting a
by sdenton4 3y ago
Yeah, exactly this. Paragraphs of condensed scientific text after six rounds of collaborator revisions are typically a mess - ChatGPT is great for suggesting a more readable alternative, and then further crafting into something actually-good.
I think a lot of the hand-wringing neglects that there's a range of ways to use LLMs. Text-refactor is obviously perfectly ethical, unless you're gunning for the Butlerian Jihad, no worse than the grammar checker in Word.
- the_af 3y ago> I think a lot of the hand-wringing neglects that there's a range of ways to use LLMs. You and the comment you replied to seem to be making an argument about something neither my own comment nor TFA said. Nobody is claiming LLMs or ChatGPT aren't useful. The argument is about using it to write parts of research papers without disclosing this usage. Nobody mentioned using ChatGPT to write code.