4 ms·

This is unfortunately Valve's equivalent of the start of Google's 'do no evil' descent into actually doing "evil". I never expected it to be over AI and copyri

by zo1 3y ago

This is unfortunately Valve's equivalent of the start of Google's 'do no evil' descent into actually doing "evil". I never expected it to be over AI and copyright.

blibble 3y ago
banning generated vomit is now evil?
- Philpax 3y ago
  Generation is a means to an end. It's up to the user to decide what that end is: it can be absolute naff, or it could be a solo auteur's masterpiece. The problem isn't AI, it's Valve's complete abdication of quality control.
- zo1 3y ago
  I'm not saying this specifically is Evil. But neither was Google "first" instance of whatever it did to start it's downward descent. At the time it was probably something silly and a thing we thought we could brush off due to the goodwill they had with us.
  - blibble 3y ago
    there's nothing downward about banning the vomit
    - zo1 3y ago
      Low effort responses like that are brain vomit. ChatGPT can do much better than you.
    - Kerb_ 3y ago
      Nothing downward about Google making sure advertisers can advertise to an audience likely to buy the product instead of truly random ad distribution either.