The state should pay for the landlord's lost revenue as damages, because of its stupid dysfunctional laws. But hey, it's California, so there's probably some l

The state should pay for the landlord's lost revenue as damages, because of its stupid dysfunctional laws. But hey, it's California, so there's probably some legal loophole that would mess that up even more. Wonder if this would qualify for YC's non technical hack question? But then again, they've removed that question...