4 ms·
As long as "legal reason" includes a reasonable list of reasons I don't see a problem with such a law. There is an inherent huge power imbalance between the la
by Drakim 3y ago
As long as "legal reason" includes a reasonable list of reasons I don't see a problem with such a law.
There is an inherent huge power imbalance between the landlord and the renter, where if the landlord ad-hoc decides to throw you out before you have a new place lined up, you might find yourself homeless. When people have such power over others, they often abuse that power in various ways, like asking for sexual favors, raising the rent cost exploitatively high at inopportune moments, or blackmailing the renter to keep quiet about violations, etc.
We as a society recognize that simply telling people "if you don't like the thing your landlord is asking of you in the middle of the night without warning, you are free to move out and become homeless until you find a new location" is not a humane and viable solution. Hence, we have laws for what can and can't be done.
- csomar 3y agoHaving traveled dozens of countries from east to west recently, I had come to an interesting observation: The countries with the most protections have the worst rental market. The countries with the least protections have a much better rental market. When there are no protection, the landlord just throw you the key. There are no papers to sign. No background check. No significant deposits (or absolutely no deposits). And no wait times. Key and go! The worst markets were the most regulated with the most "protections". The US was exceptionally bad. There are several checks (ie: credit check), wait time, deposit, papers, onboarding process, more wait time, bank balance checks, more papers to sign. etc... for a few months rental. And you'd think all these people will make for a better maintained property. Nope.
- Drakim 3y agoYou'll have no argument from me that protection and regulation can go too far. But have you considered that as you were traveling across different countries, you'd be biased towards seeing the problems that affect you (finding a new place to rent) and you'd not be seeing the problems that don't affect you (existing renters being abused)?
- csomar 3y agoBut if the market is easy, doesn't this mean that existing renters can always bounce to some new place? It seems to me that abuse can only happen if they can't find another place. Of course, you'll always have some exceptional cases but should you break the whole market just for these?
- ceejayoz 3y agoSomeone who has "traveled dozens of countries recently" is probably traveling a bit lighter than someone who's lived somewhere for several years. It seems likely you're not traveling with a couch, a bed, a nice desk, a dining room set, washer/dryer, etc. that you move with you each time. (I'd guess you're not carting a couple of young children from school system to school system, too.) Traveling is not the same thing as moving.
- Drakim 3y agoCan't just construction workers bounce to a new job if their existing job is abusing them, asking them to work under unsafe conditions, etc? It would seem abuse can only happen if they can't find another job. Regulations about how the workplace can't be a deathtrap is strangulating the market. /s Imagine you are a lone mother taking care of her kid, you are carpooling to work, and barely making ends meet. Then your landlord starts making some demands on you and starts hinting that he might throw you out otherwise. Is it realistic to say "The mother should just move out the next day, and find a new place for herself and her child, and find a new means of transportation to her job. If that new landlord abuses his power she should just move again the next day." Your viewpoint isn't uncommon, but the last few hundred years of modern society has repeatedly demonstrated that if people have leverage over others in terms of their access to food, medicine and shelter, then that power will be abused. If companies could they'd be paying you in scrip, we had to outlaw it, not simply tell workers to find a non-scrip workplace.
- plorkyeran 3y agoFor people who aren't bouncing around the world and never living in one place for more than a few months at a time, being forced to move is a very big deal even if finding the new place to live is easy.
- usrusr 3y agoLower protection leads to lower demand because low protection means high incentive for ownership. Higher demand leads to higher protection because that market implies a higher inherent power imbalance. The causal relationship you propose isn't the whole picture. Yeah, if it's difficult to find renters landlords will be happy about any that show up.