3 ms·
The wording of the title is obvious flame bait as evidenced so far in the comments, while the core point “AppleSilicon machines required for VisionOS developmen
by jsjohnst 3y ago
The wording of the title is obvious flame bait as evidenced so far in the comments, while the core point “AppleSilicon machines required for VisionOS development” would be a much more productive thing to talk about. I wish OP would’ve had a bit more maturity, but hopefully @dang can help fix so we can get back on track.
- Brian_K_White 3y agoBut that does not highlight the problem, and makes the requirement/limitation seem reasonable. The whole point is to distill the problem to it's essense and make it impossible to ignore. Obviously there are various reasonable sounding reasons how such a state of affairs comes to be. The point was that regardless, at the end of the day, there is an absurdity here, and it is not "I assumed my 50k Apple computer would be usable for Apple development." There is no hard tecnical limit to excuse it. It's completely fair to call it out.
- jsjohnst 3y ago> makes the requirement/limitation seem reasonable. If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it right well might just be a duck.