3 ms·
So clients are responsible for monitoring for leaks [1] and revoking affected keys themselves. What a disastrous architecture: centralized trust in potentially
by diarrhea 3y ago
So clients are responsible for monitoring for leaks [1] and revoking affected keys themselves. What a disastrous architecture: centralized trust in potentially (provably... [1, 2]) negligent IdPs, yet substantial, distributed burden on each client to "do the right thing". That's going to go wrong.
Also, abusing OIDC: if this takes off, the hack will be ossified as effectively part of the standard, blocking its further development and adjustment, as to not break OpenPubKey.
1: https://www.wiz.io/blog/storm-0558-compromised-microsoft-key-enables-authentication-of-countless-micr https://www.wiz.io/blog/storm-0558-compromised-microsoft-key...
2: https://infosec.exchange/@briankrebs/110820474957163710 https://infosec.exchange/@briankrebs/110820474957163710