3 ms·
> skyscraper-equivalent software As far as I know, once skyscrapers are built, they tend to stay where they are. Spacecraft, on the other hand, move around, an
by cratermoon 3y ago
> skyscraper-equivalent software
As far as I know, once skyscrapers are built, they tend to stay where they are. Spacecraft, on the other hand, move around, and do so at astonishing velocities, and need to have hyper-accurate navigation and control.
For skyscrapers, modeling the forces that act on the materials and the environment works on known quantities, based on thousands of years of building experience. The biggest failings with spacecraft involved the guidance and navigation systems: the ones that determine where it is, how fast it's moving and in what direction, and how and when to fire the engines to change velocity. The hard part is autonomous control, not static design.
- namibj 3y agoSome, like the Millennium Tower in SF, do suffer from problems that risk flattening entire neighborhoods.
- cratermoon 3y agoYes, and that was a failure in modeling the behavior of the building's supports when subjected to high winds. There's no computer controlling the building's position with a bug that will cause it to flip over and self-destruct. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ariane_flight_V88 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ariane_flight_V88
- pests 3y agoIf only we could build better software.....