3 ms·
I think very analytically the majority of the time, even when I'm not programming. When I saw this lottery in the headlines and in friends' Facebook posts, the
by andywood 15y ago
I think very analytically the majority of the time, even when I'm not programming. When I saw this lottery in the headlines and in friends' Facebook posts, the first thing I did was break out a calculator and figure all the relevant statistics of interest to me, not because I thought it might be worth it, but just to see exactly, numerically, how ridiculous the mass-attention to this lottery was. I suspect a lot of the HN community think like this.
Most people absolutely do not think this way. The thinking of the average person is more social, more concerned with ritual, more qualitative, and less quantitative. Their friends are talking about it, the number is big, people are going in on ticket pools together, they fantasize, and some of the affect of that fantasizing transfers to their goal-seeking behavior. Not fully appreciating that they can refer to solid math on this, they adapt their attitude and expectations to the cues of those around them.
- dfc 15y agoWhat is wrong with fantasizing? It seems that to HN is full of dreamers and people who ignore statistics and likely outcomes. How many small businesses fail? How many people quit their steady job in order to go join a startup?
- polyfractal 15y agoI think the difference is, right or wrong, that when people ignore statistics and pursue startups, they have the feeling that they can affect the outcome. A lottery is just a random number generator. A startup is blood, sweat and tears...and if I sweat just a little more we can beat the odds.