> The current 3rd party estimates of Kyber-512's security strength (which is a nebulous term...) puts it below the original requirements More to the point, (at

> The current 3rd party estimates of Kyber-512's security strength (which is a nebulous term...) puts it below the original requirements More to the point, (at least to my understanding) it puts it on par with another contender that was rejected from the NIST competition for being too weak a security construct.