7 ms·
Much more constructive thank you. To be honest I haven't looked into it much in the last decade just going from the news and general discourse. I've noticed tha
by worksonmine 3y ago
Much more constructive thank you. To be honest I haven't looked into it much in the last decade just going from the news and general discourse. I've noticed that we've been going into an active phase and it's mentioned a lot in other situations but never when it comes to the reasons behind climate change. Especially since it could make it worse I'd assume they'd push harder on it being more of a problem now. Feels like they're hiding something.
According to your first link we can track solar activity:
> Evidence of variations in solar activity on millennial timescales can
be found in the records of cosmogenic radionuclides in such long-lived
natural features as ice cores from large ice sheets, tree rings and ocean
sediments. Using careful statistical analysis it is now possible to
identify decadal and centennial signals of solar variability in climate data.
7% sounds low yes, but 30% is absolutely not a "small" factor. I'd think the direct effect of solar activity would be much easier to measure even on a micro level than CO2. A decade back a graph was popular where temperature and solar activity correlated almost 1:1.
I'm not trying to argue for emissions, I'd prefer no cars, fresh air and banned plastics. But an honest debate where I'm not a conspiracy nut for asking completely valid questions is not much to ask for (not directed at you just the general discourse).
If it really is serious then don't tell me we need to keep the economy going, that we have a demographic problem or try to sell me emission rights. We do or we don't, the next iphone or the next generation, that's the solution I expect to the level of threat they're telling me it is. Meanwhile they fly in private jets from summit to summit.
I'm not even trying to keep my way of living I'm already a hermit with a broken screen on my 4 year old phone, and rarely eat red meat. What they say and what they do doesn't seem to match.
- paulmd 3y agoI appreciate your tolerance and generous reading, it's just a frustration of mine. There are invariably a lot of smart people looking at any problem that is receiving widespread funding etc, and it's dismissive to be like "but what about !?!?" and like yeah they probably know. Usually it's more instructive to invert this and try to figure out what the open questions or the hot new approaches (and why they do it better) in an area is. And yes, lowest emissions is the guy with a mattress on the floor and xbox who doesn't go anywhere but nobody's ready for that talk yet.