3 ms·
I hear what you are saying. What I think that what you're missing is that subsequent conversations with AI, where humans and AI solve problems together, is what
by JieJie 3y ago
I hear what you are saying. What I think that what you're missing is that subsequent conversations with AI, where humans and AI solve problems together, is what the next generation of AI is going to be trained on. That data is being collected every time someone interacts with a chatbot, which is why they are being provided — so many of them - as a free service.
It is, as before: if the service is free, you are the product.
That being said, I think that to the extent AI is an actually helpful product, as opposed to social media, public forums, or free video hosting, the tradeoff is way more worthwhile. In my most humble opinion. I'm sure your calculus will lead to different outcomes.
- blibble 3y agoonly in very rare cases will the data from the interaction actually be useful for training, simply because the final version is rarely supplied to it yes, it's asked to produce something, but it won't see the result after substantial effort required to actually make it work the interaction is not going to be nearly enough to produce useful training data to replace e.g. stackoverflow
- visarga 3y ago> if the service is free, you are the product and if GPTBot can reach your site, you are the product, they would make you their product even if you don't use their free service but now they are not allowed to complain when others train models on GPT-4 data, they can become someone else's product too - see Orca, TinyStories and Phi-1.5