4 ms·
> If each block contains the hash of the previous block, then I think that it is a blockchain […] Or simply a 'hash chain': > A hash chain is similar to a blo
by throw0101a 3y ago
> If each block contains the hash of the previous block, then I think that it is a blockchain […]
Or simply a 'hash chain':
> A hash chain is similar to a blockchain, as they both utilize a cryptographic hash function for creating a link between two nodes. However, a blockchain (as used by Bitcoin and related systems) is generally intended to support distributed agreement around a public ledger (data), and incorporates a set of rules for encapsulation of data and associated data permissions.
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hash_chain https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hash_chain
Or perhaps:
> Linked timestamping creates time-stamp tokens which are dependent on each other, entangled in some authenticated data structure. Later modification of the issued time-stamps would invalidate this structure. The temporal order of issued time-stamps is also protected by this data structure, making backdating of the issued time-stamps impossible, even by the issuing server itself.
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linked_timestamping https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linked_timestamping
An(other) example of the latter:
This document describes a mechanism, called syslog-sign in this
document, that adds origin authentication, message integrity, replay
resistance, message sequencing, and detection of missing messages to
syslog. Essentially, this is accomplished by sending a special
syslog message. The content of this syslog message is called a
Signature Block. Each Signature Block contains, in effect, a
detached signature on some number of previously sent messages. It is
cryptographically signed and contains the hashes of previously sent
syslog messages. The originator of syslog-sign messages is simply
referred to as a "signer". The signer can be the same originator as
the originator whose messages it signs, or it can be a separate
originator.
* https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5848 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5848
- schneems 3y agoI think you’re basically saying that there are still no good known use cases for blockchain (/s but only a little)
- squarefoot 3y agoI know of at least one: making electric heaters that actually contain obsolete mining hardware instead of heating elements. Obsolete to keep costs down and to have an excuse when someone complains "hey, at least we're recycling hardware!" (/s also only a little)
- throw0101a 3y agoNIST has a good blockchain explainer: * https://csrc.nist.gov/publications/detail/nistir/8202/final https://csrc.nist.gov/publications/detail/nistir/8202/final Figure 6 is a good flowchart on helping a person decide whether it's a good solution for particular use cases. See "Distributed ledger need: blockchain, block matrix, or none?" at the bottom of: * https://csrc.nist.gov/Projects/enhanced-distributed-ledger-technology https://csrc.nist.gov/Projects/enhanced-distributed-ledger-t...
- mananaysiempre 3y agoGiven the relative clunkiness of commercial timestamping services, https://opentimestamps.org/ https://opentimestamps.org/ seems fairly useful to me.