4 ms·
A shoe has no rights. No right to loiter, enter an airport, or climb a mountain. Nor does an AI. A human has a right to use a shoe. Or an AI. I see no reas
by Terretta 3y ago
A shoe has no rights. No right to loiter, enter an airport, or climb a mountain.
Nor does an AI.
A human has a right to use a shoe. Or an AI.
I see no reason one tool is inherently profit-driven while the other benevolent.
(An exercise left to the reader: whether leather or pages are the more renewable and humane resource.)
- ang_cire 3y ago> A human has a right to use a shoe. Or an AI. What right is that, exactly? I don't remember the "Right to use a tool". You are trying to make "using a tool in a way that harms people" have greater legal or ethical weight, by falsely calling it a right, than the harm they're doing.