3 ms·
You could replace Rust for almost any language in that assertion and it would be true, so it would be good to clarify that Rust does not trail of behind C much,
by kobalsky 3y ago
You could replace Rust for almost any language in that assertion and it would be true, so it would be good to clarify that Rust does not trail of behind C much, and it's even faster than C on 4 out of 14 tests.
- queuebert 3y agoI feel like these tests are really testing the ability of the language to give hints to the compiler in its attempt to generate efficient machine code.