There is this[0] from the USC, but Fair Use is a complex topic that requires every aspect of the statute be considered. For example, tons of YouTubers make a lo

There is this[0] from the USC, but Fair Use is a complex topic that requires every aspect of the statute be considered. For example, tons of YouTubers make a lot of money based on Fair Use, such as (good) react channels who actually criticise/review/add transformative content to their reviews that show a lot of the original work, sometimes even a substantial/full portion of the original work. But it's also not fair use to just disable ads on a video/make nothing from it, and show the full original content/movie with just a video of you eating popcorn under the movie. Any claim of Fair Use ultimately has to be decided by a judge/jury. 0: (1)the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107