3 ms·
You are reproducing the abstract content, not the work itself. If your argument was valid, summaries of books and offerings like Blinkist should be illegal as w
by ajmurmann 3y ago
You are reproducing the abstract content, not the work itself. If your argument was valid, summaries of books and offerings like Blinkist should be illegal as well.
- tejtm 3y agoWhen "abstract content" has sufficient cover to generate indistinguishable replicates of the original is it still abstract? In contrast I could read Blinkist for years and it would never make me write like Hemingway. Note: I am arguing for sport here and not from some deep resentment of reality.