3 ms·
Upvoted because I think you bring up some interesting challenges, but you might consider a softer tone in the future. (Calling the OP "selfish" goes against sit
by radlad 3y ago
Upvoted because I think you bring up some interesting challenges, but you might consider a softer tone in the future. (Calling the OP "selfish" goes against site guidelines, and generally doesn't make people open to what you're saying.)
- adastra22 3y agoAgreed on tone, but I don’t thinking read calling OP selfish specifically.
- Borg3 3y agoThat selfish was NOT the the OP. It was for general audiency who prefer all the bandwidth for themselfs. We know how most people behave. They do NOT really care what others are doing. For years, I was proud of my QoS because my entire home could utilize my (not so fast Internet) and I always could do gaming, because everything was QoS correctly. Nothing fancy, just separating TCP vs UDP and futher, doing some tuning between TCP bulk vs interactive traffic. Same went to UDP, some separation for gaming/voip/interactive vs VPN (bulk). HTB is pretty decent for this.
- stephen_g 3y agoI don’t think they’re super valid concerns though - QUIC isn’t just dumb UDP that transmits as fast as it can, it has congestion control, pacing etc. built in that’s pretty similar to certain TCP algorithms, just it’s happening at the application layer instead of the kernel/socket layer handling it. In the design of these algorithms, fairness is a pretty key design criteria. If anything, potentially QUIC lets people try better congestion control algorithms without having to rebuild their kernels which could make the web better if anything…