yes! absolutely. > I think interpretable is a overloaded term. Author here, this is basically the tl;dr of the paper I kept referencing throughout the post. M

yes! absolutely. > I think interpretable is a overloaded term. Author here, this is basically the tl;dr of the paper I kept referencing throughout the post. My take, I hope I was clear, is that understanding the inner workings isn't very helpful, except for ML engineers trying to debug a model. I think I'd break the terms down something like - debuggable: The traditional definition of interpretability - trustable: What I talk about here