I am not a developer so perhaps I have a very side-lined and jaded view from my past work experience. I don't think it's as simple as replacing x in y years, r

I am not a developer so perhaps I have a very side-lined and jaded view from my past work experience. I don't think it's as simple as replacing x in y years, rather I think it's more about specific organizations and probably a big factor may be product managers in specific organizations. Some just want to get x working and out the door so they can check off a list and move onto the next thing. They might be fine with sub-standard code as that may be their exact standard. Not naming names but you all know of some. In my opinion people in those orgs should be devoting some brain cycles to finding a better place to work that will challenge their skills and provide real growth opportunities. On the other hand I still see massive oceans of CVE's out there. So clearly LLMs/AGI's/Whatever have not fixed all of the human induced bugs and that should be the easiest things for super smart AI to fix I think. That suggests to me it has not caught up to humans. When I see all the CVE's closed out as [FIXED] or [FIXED FOREVER, HACK ME BRO, JUST TRY IT] then perhaps I might be concerned for developers. Yes I expect those theoretical AGI's to get snarky in git commit comments.