3 ms·
The link you have here is 'attacking' by directly changing the meta data in C with pointer offsets and doesn't mention musl anywhere.
by CyberDildonics 3y ago
The link you have here is 'attacking' by directly changing the meta data in C with pointer offsets and doesn't mention musl anywhere.
- worthless-trash 3y agoI did not say that it did. I'm saying that I believe the same kind of attacks work against the musl allocator, or at least I think they did at that time. Musl was not being used by the business I worked in, therefore I had no interest in continuing investigation other than trying to get an understanding of how other implementations dealt with it. I'm sorry for any confusion.
- CyberDildonics 3y agoI believe the same kind of attacks work against the musl allocator Why is this even an attack and why would musl have whatever weakness is claimed here?
- worthless-trash 3y agoGotcha.