4 ms·
> development of a world model, rather than, or in addition to, a model of the training corpus But the training corpus describes the world, so a model of the t
by circuit10 3y ago
> development of a world model, rather than, or in addition to, a model of the training corpus
But the training corpus describes the world, so a model of the training corpus is a world model
- YeGoblynQueenne 3y agoA model of a training corpus is a model of a training corpus. Unless a system can read the corpus and understand what it says, it won't get any world model by modelling the corpus.
- xcv123 3y agoYou have a subjective philosophical disagreement and are entitled to your opinion but it's not a technical argument. It provides "a" world model and it's a useful model for its intended purpose. Not the "one true model" that is your your own personal life experience since birth.
- circuit10 3y agoThen humans also have a model our training corpus, which is an interpretation of the world via our senses. If we don’t ever directly experience the true underlying reality, do we truly understand it? In a way no, but it’s close enough that we call it understanding