5 ms·
I don’t see it as deceitful and I’d eat my hat if most other users didn’t agree with me. I expect that when I click a search result link, that Google will be
by tmpX7dMeXU 3y ago
I don’t see it as deceitful and I’d eat my hat if most other users didn’t agree with me.
I expect that when I click a search result link, that Google will be tracking that I’ve done this.
I also appreciate being able to search for something, right-click-copy a link, and send it to someone, without it being covered in tracking cruft.
- lxgr 3y ago> right-click-copy a link, and send it to someone, without it being covered in tracking cruft. That’s exactly the use case Google breaks, though: The link gets covered in tracking cruft and it gets very hard to tell where it even leads from just looking at it.
- jasonlotito 3y agoJust tried it. It worked as expected: right-click, copy a link, and it's the link to the source, not Google or a redirect.
- jraph 3y agoThey must have fixed it, it wasn't like this in the past. I remember being annoyed by this when I was still using Google.
- huhtenberg 3y agoHere, in a fresh Firefox profile - https://i.imgur.com/RKvnJoq.gif https://i.imgur.com/RKvnJoq.gif
- tech234a 3y agoThis may be a Chrome vs Firefox issue, as Firefox doesn’t support the ping attribute for a (link) elements in HTML. The ping attribute allows sending a POST request in the background to arbitrary URLs when a link is clicked. [1]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/a https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/a