3 ms·

I don't see a single logical argument in your comment about why "nothing about this is redeemable". You just seem to imply that everyone who disagrees with you

I don't see a single logical argument in your comment about why "nothing about this is redeemable". You just seem to imply that everyone who disagrees with you is wrong. So I ask, why are they wrong?

hef19898 3y ago
Animal trials are not wrong in and of themselves. There are ruls and best practices around them so, with the goal to minimize animal suffering. Neuralink constantly ignores those. And no potential benefit justifies these things, because the same benefits can be had by not taking any short cuts. What Neuralink does is ignoring rules, and they din't even have anything to show for it. Sad so just how many people on HN actively look for excuses and justifications were none are to be found, "move fast and break things" is really strong in some people...
- foverzar 3y ago
  > Neuralink constantly ignores those. Is that actually a fact that Neuralink and co don't adhere to relevant industry standards?