4 ms·
I started with extremely low confidence in LLM, so I've only every asked simple questions on well-covered topics; it hasn't really steered me wrong yet but agai
by NikolaNovak 3y ago
I started with extremely low confidence in LLM, so I've only every asked simple questions on well-covered topics; it hasn't really steered me wrong yet but again that's because of deliberately very conservative use.
(Genuine) Question then: Does "No that's wrong"... every do something? Is there any reason to do so other than having fun arguing? I.e. if it gives wrong answer initially, and the user knows it's the wrong answer... what's the goal/desired outcome in telling it it's wrong and asking it again? Does that goal every get accomplished? What is the confidence in the second answer?
From a less black box perspective, is there any "ELI5" or at least "ELI45" explanation of why it might ever work? :)
- keenmaster 3y agoThere are topics where GPT-4 is more likely to be right than wrong. So when it is occasionally wrong and you happen to know to correct it, it has a more correct foundation upon which to provide further answers. This only really works when you already have expertise on the topic and use GPT-4 for inspiration and to work more quickly.