> They're both published by NIH. One of them was published in Vacunas https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=%22Vacunas%22[Title+Abbreviation] https://w

> They're both published by NIH. One of them was published in Vacunas https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=%22Vacunas%22[Title+Abbreviation] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=%22Vacunas%22[T... The other was published in Science Advances https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=%22Sci+Adv%22%5BTitle+Abbreviation%5D https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=%22Sci+Adv%22%5... Noted on one of the pages: > As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health. I think an unfortunate number of people assume that because an article appears in the pubmed section provided by the NIH that it's somehow endorsed or published by the NIH. That's not the case.