3 ms·
It doesn't have to be actively malevolent. It's enough for it to be sufficiently powerful and to have goals that aren't properly aligned with ours. See https:
by Paul-Craft 3y ago
It doesn't have to be actively malevolent. It's enough for it to be sufficiently powerful and to have goals that aren't properly aligned with ours. See https://www.lesswrong.com/tag/squiggle-maximizer-formerly-paperclip-maximizer https://www.lesswrong.com/tag/squiggle-maximizer-formerly-pa...
- pmarreck 3y agoThe direction that discussion takes is ridiculously speculative, and anything with Yudkowski's name on it screams "FUDdite" to me