3 ms·

Looks like they are matching Amazon's offering. Even though Amazon has not released an API to its cloud drive (its only a matter of time before they will). Dro

by yalogin 15y ago

Looks like they are matching Amazon's offering. Even though Amazon has not released an API to its cloud drive (its only a matter of time before they will). Dropbox really should have sold to Apple when they had a chance. It will be interesting to see how iCloud and these new offerings impact their adoption rates. Looks like Box did a better differentiation by going explicitly after the enterprise integration.

hcurtiss 15y ago
Agreed. I would not have believed it if you told me three years ago, but box.com is positioning to significantly outpace dropbox in the enterprise space (i.e., the pay for service space). I work with banks and law firms. Dropbox is perceived as the devil (though I don't think it's as bad as our IT admin makes it out to be). On the other hand, many have formally adopted a branded versions of box.com. Crazy.
- oneplusone 15y ago
  Box has very confusing pricing for personal use. Why limit file size? Makes no sense. They are also 2x times as expensive as Dropbox. $20/month only gets me 50gb on box.com, whereas I get 100gb with dropbox. And no annoying file size restriction. Dropbox teams also seem like a much better deal.
  - hcurtiss 15y ago
    Frankly, in my experience, it's all about perceived security. That and the utility of setting permissions for third party access with read/modify logs. It's kind of like Merrill's data room, but web 2.0'y and faster/more user friendly. Dropbox was easier (I loved being able to right click a zip file sitting in my public folder), but our clients told us it was too risky to have a document sitting on an open live link without password/user access control. We're currently using sendthisfile.com, but I believe we're moving to box.com soon. We're a top end AmLaw 200 firm.
  - toomuchtodo 15y ago
    I was quoted $480/year per user on Box.net (80 users). Dropbox may not be as good as them, but is a satisfactory solution based on their significantly lower pricing.

by yalogin 15y ago

hcurtiss 15y ago

Agreed. I would not have believed it if you told me three years ago, but box.com is positioning to significantly outpace dropbox in the enterprise space (i.e., the pay for service space). I work with banks and law firms. Dropbox is perceived as the devil (though I don't think it's as bad as our IT admin makes it out to be). On the other hand, many have formally adopted a branded versions of box.com. Crazy.

oneplusone 15y ago
Box has very confusing pricing for personal use. Why limit file size? Makes no sense. They are also 2x times as expensive as Dropbox. $20/month only gets me 50gb on box.com, whereas I get 100gb with dropbox. And no annoying file size restriction. Dropbox teams also seem like a much better deal.
- hcurtiss 15y ago
  Frankly, in my experience, it's all about perceived security. That and the utility of setting permissions for third party access with read/modify logs. It's kind of like Merrill's data room, but web 2.0'y and faster/more user friendly. Dropbox was easier (I loved being able to right click a zip file sitting in my public folder), but our clients told us it was too risky to have a document sitting on an open live link without password/user access control. We're currently using sendthisfile.com, but I believe we're moving to box.com soon. We're a top end AmLaw 200 firm.
- toomuchtodo 15y ago
  I was quoted $480/year per user on Box.net (80 users). Dropbox may not be as good as them, but is a satisfactory solution based on their significantly lower pricing.