3 ms·
She paid $20,000. Her argument is that he stole $20,000 from her since he didn't have a legal right to rent the property but took her money anyway. She has offe
by lukeschlather 3y ago
She paid $20,000. Her argument is that he stole $20,000 from her since he didn't have a legal right to rent the property but took her money anyway. She has offered to leave if he returns the funds. Analogies fall flat pretty quickly, but the fact is it does seem like this situation is an intended penalty for a civil infraction he committed.
- mc32 3y agoShe would have a better argument if she did not occupy the abode and then would claim fraud or whatever and ask for her money back. Here she's eating her cake AND having it too.