4 ms·
> Fair. So when somebody shares their pet theory about the CIA doing some shit > and they don't have evidence on hand, how do you respond? Me personally i woul
by almatabata 3y ago
> Fair. So when somebody shares their pet theory about the CIA doing some shit > and they don't have evidence on hand, how do you respond?
Me personally i would listen just out of curiosity as long as it stayed civil. Most of the time it does so most of the time you can just listen and decide if you want to take it on board.
> I'm not accusing you personally of this, but the second kind of response is
> very common.
I agree yes. People forget just how crazy certain theories sounded at the time. With MKULTRA you had the government giving hard drugs to citizen to see if they could brainwash them. If i came out today and said that the government operates an underground clinic to create super soldiers people would think i have lost my marbles.
- lazide 3y agoThe takeaway I guess is that it’s best for any unethical top-secret programs to have as outlandish and ridiculous a premise as possible. Even if there is a leak, no one would believe it! That would explain why Operation Condor leaked. It needed something more outlandish. Like instead of assassinations and regime change, perhaps replacing key South American leaders with American body doubles with allegiance to the CIA?
- ConceptJunkie 3y agoWell, with the recent discovery and harnessing of Vita-Rays, I might be inclined to think that's not so far-fetched.