I'm skeptical. It might not make sense financially, but falsely accusing someone of something that wasn't done isn't absolved by using automated tools. It sti

I'm skeptical. It might not make sense financially, but falsely accusing someone of something that wasn't done isn't absolved by using automated tools. It still requires a person to interpret the results and assess a penalty. Does the Code of Student Conduct say that plagiarism is bad? Or does it say that some secret program will assess the paper and be the sole judge of plagiarism? I'm guessing it's not the latter. Personally, I would stand my ground and tell the professor straight up, "I'm not writing it again, I've written it once." Leave them with the understanding of the hell to be paid for accusing me falsely. When I didn't do the work, I accepted the bad grades -- I didn't cheat. When I do the work, they will accept it, or we'll hash it out to the end of the earth.