3 ms·
I can't (or, more accurately, don't) believe that, but I can certainly believe they have nothing interesting to say about the topic of static vs dynamic typing.
by mcronce 3y ago
I can't (or, more accurately, don't) believe that, but I can certainly believe they have nothing interesting to say about the topic of static vs dynamic typing.
- _a_a_a_ 3y agoI'm very much with you on static typing but you've closed your mind with a slam. Please don't.
- lovich 3y agoAn open mind is like a fortress with its gates unbarred and unguarded. It is both useful and allowed to have a certain level of belief that won’t be crossed without heavy effort. The OP didn’t even say they were closed to the conversation completely, but that a random person with no pre built trust isn’t going to get the time of day from them to rehash the same settled argument.
- _a_a_a_ 3y ago"Matz or Jose Valim or Van Rossom or the creators of Julia" from memory Matz -> ruby, Valim-> elixir, Van Rossum -> python, and 'the creators of Julia' -> julia Not 'random persons' then
- lovich 3y agoYea, the OP was referencing randos from his perspective and the responder subbed in famous software developers. They weren’t arguing on the same point