2 ms·
And you simply can't have that sort of error in Smalltalk. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
by mpweiher 3y ago
And you simply can't have that sort of error in Smalltalk.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- jjnoakes 3y agoYou absolutely can.
- mpweiher 3y agoThat turns out not to be the case. Smalltalk is memory safe and dynamically type-safe. That is, you cannot invoke an inappropriate operation. You can try to do that, but the system will refuse to do so.
- jjnoakes 3y agoIt's trivial to store sensitive data in a collection, for example, and then index it with the wrong index when trying to access and export adjacent non-sensitive data.
- iopq 3y agoThat's assuming you're mixing sensitive data and insensitive data in one collection. Heartbleed was access of random memory, a much more serious exploit