Well argumented! However, consider that any evidence, google data or not, has the problem that it might be held against an innocent. Any evidence has to be con

Well argumented! However, consider that any evidence, google data or not, has the problem that it might be held against an innocent. Any evidence has to be considered with caution. Basing a conviction on, let's say location only, is not passing the reasonable doubt test. The problem I see is when the justice system would become 'lazy' and would not look beyond automatically collected data. The non-auto-collected evidence is harder to get, hence the result (from a total set of evidences) could get heavily biased.