3 ms·
It... should be up for debate? I'm fine taking it as a given in projects I'm running. But I do expect people that have the ability to do so, to debate it. Pr
by taeric 3y ago
It... should be up for debate? I'm fine taking it as a given in projects I'm running. But I do expect people that have the ability to do so, to debate it. Preferably to study it and find concrete evidence.
- Chabsff 3y agoAdmittedly, that was a bit hyperbolic on my part. What I meant to convey is that the matter is settled enough from my point of view that there needs to be a very strong case being made for me to be willing to engage in that conversation. Thanks for pointing this out, I've amended the comment to clarify a bit.
- mpweiher 3y ago> the matter is settled enough Based on what evidence? Apart from emotion?
- taeric 3y agoCharity to the idea, when boots are on the ground to do the actual work is a terribly place for running that debate. :D Is why I'm in agreement enough for projects I'm working on. I am open to the idea that we find more evidence and/or change our minds for the next project, but "when in Rome" is a good reason to drop the debate and basically declaim what your driving idea is at the start.