3 ms·
> This is also precious coming from an industry that uses automated emails for rejection. Yeah you don’t want to write 80 personalized rejection emails (probabl
by davely 3y ago
> This is also precious coming from an industry that uses automated emails for rejection. Yeah you don’t want to write 80 personalized rejection emails (probably way more) aaaand we don’t want to write 80 (or more) cover letters. I feel that’s pretty fair.
This is such a brilliantly good point!
Before getting my current job, I think I had applied to around 180 companies (getting about 10 callbacks -> 3 on sites -> 1 offer).
And I totally used an automated script I wrote for creating cover letters. It was basically a general template about me, listing relevant skills and interests, a blank variable for company name, and then an area where I could say why I wanted to work for XYZ.
Made that part of the process so much easier.
Interestingly, being on the other side, when I’ve reviewed candidate applications before phone screens or interviews, I always enjoyed reading cover letters.
- 4hEn 3y agoThis might fix it: charge the candidate some $amount for each application they send. Also charge the employer $amount * some_factor for each application they receive. This can filter out candidates that aren't really interested, and companies that aren't really hiring. The cost to an employer to accept (not review) 100 applications is about 1/100th of the cost to the candidate. Employers have more information about the applicants individually and in aggregate but candidates don't about the companies. Employers don't give much basic feedback to candidates, like underqualified, overqualified, not sure, something else.