I don't see how that follows from your link, which doesn't make a big deal of the inaccuracy of carbon dating. In fact, it says: >Radiocarbon dating works on o

I don't see how that follows from your link, which doesn't make a big deal of the inaccuracy of carbon dating. In fact, it says: >Radiocarbon dating works on organic materials up to about 60,000 years of age. Which would certainly cover a woven basket. What exactly from the link should a reader take away, which is relevant to the article and the point you're trying to make?