4 ms·

I see what you mean about it being "all over the place" first they discuss a great product alone is not enough but then instead talk about plans and ideas rathe

I see what you mean about it being "all over the place" first they discuss a great product alone is not enough but then instead talk about plans and ideas rather than prototypes/implementations. I've never started a business so my naive viewpoint is that many of the most successful companies appear to be built on having a great product alone then focusing on profit second, for example Google, Facebook, and Twitter. These are the largest of the the large though, so is the story different for smaller companies?

HeyLaughingBoy 15y ago
That's not even the story for most big companies. Consider Apple, Microsoft, Toyota, Honda and Ford. In most cases "build great product first then focus on profit later" means you run out of money before anyone buys enough of your product for you to get back in the black.
Estragon 15y ago
Never started a company either, but I think the key issue is barrier to entry. Facebook and Twitter have networks which are impossible to duplicate, and Google got a lot of money up front and used it to move really fast. In contrast, the great product they describe in the article is a standalone piece of software by a small group, easily duplicated if it takes off.